A cura di @Festina Lente.

Come prima di una serie di segnalazioni sul commercio fra Cina ed Asia Centrale ed Europa, presentiamo gli atti del convegno “Silk Roads Again: Revisiting Roads Connecting Eurasia organized” (Università di Hanyang, Corea del Nord, 2016). Si tratta di una serie di articoli (in formato PDF, distribuiti secondo la licenza Creative Commons) dedicati alla storia della via della seta e pubblicati su Journal of Eurasian Studies (vol. 8, sessione speciale “The Silk Roads Again: Past, Present and Future”, 2017). Di seguito, riportiamo il link agli articoli seguito dall’abstract.

Silk roads again: Revisiting roads connecting Eurasia
Gu Ho Eom – Pagine 1-2. (Prefazione)

Beyond frontiers: Ancient Rome and the Eurasian trade networks
Marco Galli – Pagine 3-9.

During the second half of the 19th century, the Roman Empire was already considered one of the key players inside the Eurasian networks. This research focuses on four relevant points. From a historiographical perspective, the reconstruction of the trading routes represented a central theme in the history of the relationship between the Roman Empire and the Far East. Imagining a plurality of itineraries and combinations of overland and sea routes, it is possible to reconstruct a complex reality in which the Eurasian networks during the Early Roman Empire developed. As far as economics is concerned, new documentation demonstrates the wide range and the extraordinary impact of the Eastern products on Roman markets. A final focus on the process of Chinese silk unravelling and reweaving provides an important clue on how complex and absolutely not mono-directional were the interactions and the exchanges in the Eurasian networks during the first centuries of the Roman Empire.

The ‘owl of misfortune’ or the ‘phoenix of prosperity’?
Re-thinking the impact of the Mongols
Daniel C. Waugh – Pagine 10-21.

The impact of Mongol conquests across Eurasia is still controversial: did they destroy everything in their path or rather create a “Mongol peace” under which the Silk Road exchanges flourished? Too often medieval authors are cited merely for their negative reaction to the Mongols. Yet both the written sources and evidence from archeology show a picture of some complexity that requires critical analysis. The emphasis here is on archeology, often ignored or slighted by historians of the Mongols, and on evidence from Central Asia and Eastern Europe, primarily as reported in Russian-language scholarship. The impact of the Mongols varied depending on the location and the priorities of the new conquerors.

Actually existing silk roads
Magnus Marsden – Pagine 22-30.

This article explores the relevance of the concept of Silk Road for understanding the patterns of trade and exchange between China, Eurasia and the Middle East. It is based on ethnographic fieldwork in the city of Yiwu, in China’s Zhejiang Province. Yiwu is a node in the global distribution of Chinese ‘small commodities’ and home to merchants and traders from across Asia and beyond. The article explores the role played by traders from Afghanistan in connecting the city of Yiwu to markets and trading posts in the world beyond. It seeks to bring attention to the diverse types of networks involved in such forms of trade, as well as their emergence and development over the past thirty years.

“My Silk Road to You”:
Re-imagining routes, roads, and geography
in contemporary art of “Central Asia”

Diana T. Kudaibergenova – Pagine 31-43.

This paper re-focuses the Silk Road discussions from the position of contemporary art in Central Asian region. Since the late 1980s contemporary art in Central Asia boomed and it eventually became an alternative public space for the discussion of cultural transformations, social and global processes and problems that local societies faced. Initially the questions raised by many artists concerned issues of lost identity and lost heritage during the period of Soviet domination in the region. Different artists started re-imagining the concept of the Self in their works and criticising the old rigid approaches to geography, history and mobility. Nomadic heritage became one of the central themes in contemporary art of Central Asia in the 1990s. Artists started experimenting with symbols of mobility, fluid borders and imagined geography of the “magic steppe” (see Kudaibergenova 2017, “Punk Shamanism”). Contemporary art in Central Asia continues to serve as a space for social critique and a space for search and re-conceptualisation of new fluid identities, geographies and region’s place on the world map. In this paper I critically evaluate three themes connected to the symbolism of Silk Road heritage that many artists engage with – imagined geography, routes, roads and mobility. All three themes are present in the selected case studies of Gulnara Kasmalieva’s and Muratbek Djumaliev’s TransSiberian Amazons (2005) and A New Silk Road: Algorithm of Survival and Hope (2007) multi-channel video art, Victor and Elena Vorobievs’ (Non)Silk Road (2006) performance and photography, Almagul Menlibayeva’s My Silk Road to You video-art and photography (2010–2011), Yerbossyn Meldibekov’s series on imagining Central Asia and the Mountains of Revolution (2012–2015), and Syrlybek Bekbotaev’s Kyrgyz Pass installation (2014–2015) as well as Defenders of Issyk Kul (2014). I trace how artists modernise, mutate and criticise main discourses about Silk Road and what impact this has on the re-imagination processes.

Immagine da Wikimedia Commons.