stiamo tranquilli…

Perché ci si oppone alle sigarette elettroniche? [EN]

0 commenti

A cura di @Billy Pilgrim.

Sul suo blog, Matt Ridley si interroga sulle motivazioni di chi sta cercando di scoraggiare o mettere al bando la sigaretta elettronica, una tecnologia che si sta rivelando molto efficace nel ridurre i danni causati dal fumo:

Suppose that millions of Britons were driving a dangerous type of car that was killing 80,000 people a year. Suppose somebody invented a new car that was much, much safer, significantly cheaper, and emitted far fewer fumes, while performing just as well. Would you a) ban the new car, or b) encourage people to buy it? Not that difficult a question, surely. Yet the reaction of many public health professionals and politicians has been to choose a) in an exactly analogous situation relating to nicotine. Why? Because they would rather you did not drive at all.

Take, for example, this recent pronouncement by the mayor of San Francisco: “Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States. Tobacco kills more than 480,000 people a year in this country. That’s more than AIDS, alcohol, car accidents, illegal drugs, murders, and suicides combined.” Therefore, he goes on — in one of the great non-sequiturs of history — he is going to ban ecigarettes, which have caused none of those deaths and could prevent them, but not ban real cigarettes, which caused nearly all of those deaths.

Immagine da Flickr – Lindsay Fox at EcigaretteReviewed.com.


Commenta qui sotto e segui le linee guida del sito.